About the Index
What is the the Out of the Shadows Index?
The Out of the Shadows Index is the global benchmark of national governments' efforts to prevent and respond to sexual violence against children and adolescents. The Index is researched and developed by Economist Impact, with advocacy and engagement efforts led by Together for Girls (TfG).
How does the Index work?
The Index ranks 60 countries across 6 regions, which together are home to 83% of the world’s children. It does not measure the scale of the problem, but rather scores countries across 23 indicators, covering key laws, policies, programs, and services that a government should have in place to end sexual violence against children and adolescents in their country.
Survivor activists, civil society, youth advocates, and policymakers worldwide use the Index to drive government accountability and action, including by inspiring strong national pledges at the 2nd Global Ministerial Conference on Ending Violence Against Children (EVAC) in pursuit of achieving UN Sustainable Development Goal 16.2: ending violence against children by 2030.
The Index was first launched in 2019 by World Childhood Foundation, and was researched and developed by Economist Impact. Today, Economist Impact continues to lead the research, while Together for Girls drives its use for advocacy. The 2026 Index is launched in partnership with the Brave Movement, Project Everyone, and the Index’s Advisory Group.
A note on terminology The Index uses “sexual violence against children (SVAC)” or “childhood sexual violence” to encompass any act of a sexual nature against a person under 18 years of age, including physical, verbal, non-verbal, and technology-facilitated conduct. This includes both contact and non-contact sexual acts whether attempted or completed, such as rape and sexual assault, exploitation, harassment and sexualised exposure or communication. This approach recognises the broad spectrum of sexual violence that children may experience, including violence perpetrated by both adults and peers, including instances where a child lacks the capacity to give informed consent or where there is an imbalance of age, development, responsibility or authority., |
How was the 2026 Index developed?
The Index is now in its third iteration, following editions published in 2019 and 2022. The 2026 Index is based on an updated methodology and Index framework developed by Economist Impact. These revisions were informed by an evidence review process commissioned by TfG in 2024, to understand how the Index is used, barriers to uptake and how it could be strengthened to improve utility.
Building on these findings, Economist Impact revised the Index framework, with advisory input from TfG and a multi-sector Advisory Group composed of 17 experts and academics, civil society representatives, youth advocates and survivor leaders, to ensure the Index is technically robust, usable and accessible in practice and survivor-informed.
What does the Index measure?
The 2026 Index scores countries on 23 indicators across four pillars, assessing a foundational set of laws, policies, strategies and services that a government should have in place to end SVAC in its country. Childlight’s complementary Into the Light index shows the scale of child sexual abuse and exploitation. The Out of the Shadows Index pillars are:
- Governance and accountability: Assesses whether governments have the leadership, plans and evidence base needed to prevent and respond to SVAC—alongside efforts to engage survivors, children and adolescents in shaping more inclusive and responsive systems.
- Prevention: Examines a range of key measures to reduce the risk of SVAC before it occurs and respond quickly to suspected abuse, covering: national education systems; parenting and care-giver support; safeguarding systems; and accessible helplines.
- Healing: Explores whether survivors can access timely, free and multi-disciplinary recovery services and support, spanning: crisis care and follow-up services; national guidance for response professionals; and other practical enablers of recovery such as legal aid and pathways to compensation.
- Justice: Assesses the strength of legal protections and justice-system capacity to respond to SVAC, including: comprehensive criminalisation of offline and online offences; specialised law enforcement capability; and safeguards for children in criminal justice proceedings.
Drawing on the “Prevention, healing, and justice” framework developed by the Brave Movement ensures that the Index is informed by and responsive to individuals with lived experience of trauma.
The Index also includes background indicators, which provide contextual measures related to countries’ structural conditions and broader risk/protective environment that help interpret Index results. These indicators do not contribute to scoring.
One of these background indicators tracks budgetary commitment. To support transparency and accountability, the Index team set out to assess whether national budget documents included specific SVAC-related line items. What we found was that this information is rarely presented in a clear, consistent and accessible way within core budget documents. Consequently, the original scoring indicator was removed over concerns that it would unintentionally measure the visibility of budget information rather than actual government commitment or disbursement related to SVAC, and was replaced with a broader measure of national budget transparency.
However, this lack of transparency is a critical finding in itself. It indicates that stakeholders are being left in the dark about levels of public investment, the adequacy of resources and whether governments are delivering on their commitments to ending SVAC. In the absence of clear budget reporting, commitments risk becoming little more than rhetoric that is shielded from scrutiny and disconnected from meaningful action.
How were countries selected to be included in the Index?
This 2026 Index covers 60 countries across 6 regions which together are home to 83% of the world’s child population and adolescents.
Countries were selected by Economist Impact during the development of the 2019 iteration of the Index as a representative global sample that reflects that SVAC affects all nations, regardless of wealth, geography or culture. The selection began with the G20 and “Pathfinding” countries—those committed to faster progress under the Global Partnership to End Violence Against Children.
Economist Impact also included countries that have carried out Violence Against Children and Youth Surveys or collected comparable data on sexual violence against boys, as noted by UNICEF.
Expert input guided the inclusion of countries of special concern and those with high estimated rates of sexual violence, based on the Know Violence in Childhood global learning initiative.
Final adjustments ensured balanced regional coverage, following World Bank income and geographic classifications.
What data sources were used to score the Index and how was the data collected?
All data for the Index were collected in 2025 and analysed by the Economist Impact project team. The Index includes two types of indicators: those scored through desk-based qualitative research by Economist Impact; and those based on existing publicly available data from reputable third-party sources.
The majority of indicators were scored using data collected through desk-based qualitative research. To score these indicators, Economist Impact used experienced research analysts with the required linguistic expertise. Analysts reviewed publicly available information and provided structured and referenced responses aligned to the indicator scoring guidance (see Appendix 4). Key sources reviewed included:
- Primary legal texts and policy documents;
- Government websites and publications (including national action plans, annual reports and guidance issued by relevant authorities, such as child protection agencies, child affairs bodies and law enforcement);
- Reports and assessments produced by international and civil society organisations;
- Academic literature and technical studies; and
- Credible international and local news reporting, where relevant.
- Another subset of indicators draws on existing, publicly available data published by reputable third-party sources (including ECPAT International, the World Health Organisation [WHO], Girls Not Brides and the US Department of State). For these indicators, Economist Impact collected data from the original sources and applied the Index scoring criteria.
Following data collection, Economist Impact undertook an extensive quality assurance process. Together for Girls also reviewed draft data as part of the quality assurance process. Following reviews, Economist Impact conducted a calibration exercise across countries to ensure consistent application of scoring criteria and minimise variability in interpretation between analysts and reviewers.
For more information please see our full methodology paper which contains specifics on:
- How were countries selected for inclusion in the Index?
- How were countries scored when sexual violence against children is regulated at the sub-national level?
- How was the data validated and which countries participated?
- How was the data modelled to calculate the Index scores and rankings?
- How were weightings assigned to the data to calculate the Index scores and rankings?
- What are the study’s limitations?
- Full Index framework and indicator list with research guidance
- List of sub-national jurisdictions
Meet the Advisory Group members
This multi-sector advisory group informs, advises and enables the Index to be a strategic advocacy tool for ending childhood sexual violence around the world.